“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” Goes an old Latin phrase which literally translates to "Who will guard the guards themselves," and is variously translated in colloquial English as "Who watches the watchmen?", "Who watches the watchers?", "Who will guard the guards?", "Who shall watch the watchers?" or other similar translations.
Some people may claim that they are the watchers, guards, protectors of the truth, but who watches over them? Who watches over the watchers themselves? Who makes certain that the guards are really safeguarding what they are supposed to protect and not abusing the power and authority given to them? What if they are the ones who taint, pollute and corrupt the very thing that they are guarding, for their own selfish reasons, for their own egocentric satisfaction?
Knowing the influence that you can deliver to people doesn’t give you the freedom to maliciously stain other people’s repute, nor does it give you the freedom to include your selfish intentions. Anyway, what’s done has been done. Whatever damage they wanted to cause, they’ve successfully inflicted it.
“Qui tacet consentire.” But, this time, my being silent doesn’t mean that I assent to whatever has been going out. Anyway, why should I be intimidated or affected, when I know that the guards weren’t doing the guarding well.
“Si finis bonus est, totum bonum erit.” Was it good then? Let’s just see…
Some people may claim that they are the watchers, guards, protectors of the truth, but who watches over them? Who watches over the watchers themselves? Who makes certain that the guards are really safeguarding what they are supposed to protect and not abusing the power and authority given to them? What if they are the ones who taint, pollute and corrupt the very thing that they are guarding, for their own selfish reasons, for their own egocentric satisfaction?
Knowing the influence that you can deliver to people doesn’t give you the freedom to maliciously stain other people’s repute, nor does it give you the freedom to include your selfish intentions. Anyway, what’s done has been done. Whatever damage they wanted to cause, they’ve successfully inflicted it.
“Qui tacet consentire.” But, this time, my being silent doesn’t mean that I assent to whatever has been going out. Anyway, why should I be intimidated or affected, when I know that the guards weren’t doing the guarding well.
“Si finis bonus est, totum bonum erit.” Was it good then? Let’s just see…
Comments
btaW2..the watchers should have someone to watch over them..
ok ra nah..reCover2 rah gud..aWw?ashIhishi..
dLi btaw kah affeCtEd..aYt?..
//_^
Cge ra Don... recover2 ra kuno... nyaaahaha... aw, affected ka?... ahaha... ayaw bah...
"'Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD. (NIV, Leviticus 19:18)
to Janjie:
A fool always loses his temper, but a wise man holds it back. (NAS, Proverbs 29:11)
..on "knowing the influence that you can deliver to people...", whether what they had given out is the REAL truth or not, what people would believe is what they had already carried out..
..well, what can we do..?talk about crap interviews..nyahaha..
@Mary Narvasa: Hi there... Thanks for dropping by... and yeah, I'm very fine. It's so pleasing to know that this post caused many reactions from some people...
@Jhet: nyaahaha... yea yea.. I get it.. I wasn't expecting the reactions... Geez.. well, at least, now they know what a single article can cause. Very indirect pa gani ni, samot na guro nang naa jud tone and malice na "news" article. Nyaahaha... and yea, that crappy thing... haha... ayaw bah...